Lew Renders Judgement

There's a couple of ways of parsing Lew's latest grousing.  Charitably, if one is innocent, then one is unaware of worldly or complex things, ignorant of the dark side of life.  If we are to take Lew's comments this way, then he's rendering a compliment, saying, in effect, that his fellow conservatives are seasoned veterans who are aware of the ins and outs of politics.

Does anyone here really think Lew meant it that way?  No?  Me neither.

No, I'm pretty sure Lew means we are not innocent, as in the opposite of guilty.  If his named culprits aren't innocent, then they must be. . . GUILTY! 

Guilty of what? One may very well ask.  Given that Lew has yet to answer a single question brought forward in this venue to substantiate the accusations he's leveled at his detractors, he has no evidential case to present except his own rhetoric, wildly inaccurate assumptions and empty accusations of unethical behavior. His entire case collapses like a house of cards at the slightest cross-examination, which is why he's not answered any questions posed to him by those he accuses.

The interesting thing is that Lew encourages people to review the posts to see the history.   Do those posts include the comments and threads that were deleted by Lew that he had no answer to and showed how much hot air he was full of?  Of course not! 

So the verdict is guilty!  And the crime is. . . .Well, disagreeing with THE Clark County Conservative, apparently. 

Ah, I love the sound of a good debate in the morning!  It reminds me of. . .. Freedom.